Viewed 1525 times.Voices of the winner and the representative of Azerbaijan in "Eurovision 2013" bought? (video)
Viewed 96 times.Who are actually Alevis?
Viewed 75 times.World's biggest captive crocodile got chicken cake for his 110th birthday
Viewed 73 times.Yerevan after rain (video)
Viewed 68 times.Final of "Eurovision 2013" will be held today
Viewed 55 times.Mou to Gomez: "Go and celebrate with team."
Viewed 49 times.Vladimir Gasparyan and Seyran Ohanyan are negotiating with killed soldier's relatives
Viewed 48 times.4 subjective reasons why Armenia took the 8th place from the end of "Eurovision 2013"contest
Viewed 42 times."Do you know who I am? I am Prime Minister's adviser."
Viewed 41 times.Vanadzor Mayor to apologize publicly
Viewed 38 times.Mila Kunis tops poll of most wanted celebrity to appear in sex tape
Viewed 34 times.Protest in front of RA National Assembly. Shushan Petrosyan was greeted with whistles (photos)
Viewed 33 times.King of ruins
Viewed 31 times.Government's program of demoralization
Viewed 31 times.Covered Market is also a cultural monument
Since 1996, Armenian elections have never been held in conformity with democratic standards - analyst Edgar Vardanyan.
Since 1996, Armenian elections have never been held in conformity with democratic standards. That is, they have never been free, fair and transparent.
At his meeting with journalists on Thursday, Edgar Vardanian, an expert for the Armenian Center for National and International Studies (ACNIS), cited OSCE/ODIHR monitoring mission’s final report on Armenian elections.
The results do not include the May 6 parliamentary elections.
The OSCE/ODIHR is a well-known monitoring organization and its reports serve as a basis for the Armenian expert.
With respect to trends in parliamentary and presidential elections, Vardanyan pointed out upward trends in the case of parliamentary elections and downward trends in the case of presidential elections.
The OSCE/ODIHR report contains clear comparisons. “If the report clearly indicates elections do not meet democratic standards, it means elections are not free and transparent. Although the elections are not considered democratic, there is a difference – they are better than elections that do not meet any standards at all,” the expert said.
The 1990 and 2003 elections were considered the worst by the OSCE/ODIHR . “Those elections were clearly classified as not meeting international standards. Serious problems were pointed out in 2004. The 2008 elections were the worst with respect to mass media coverage,” Vardanyan said.

