The court's conclusions are not based on an objective assessment of all the circumstances of "Matagis case"

Prosecutors on resonance "Matagis case" believe that the court of first instance of Shirak region has been a fundamental breach of the substantive and procedural law, due to a judicial act, which, according to the prosecution, distorts the very essence of justice, violates the necessary balance between the protected interests and values.

According to the prosecution, the court's conclusions are not based on objective, complete and comprehensive assessment of the circumstances, all the facts presented by the prosecutors of the case were not taken into account, in the event that they would be given a legal assessment, the court would have come to different conclusions, which would affect significantly outcome of this matter, reports Faktinfo.

Yesterday RA Military Prosecutor's Office filed an appeal against the acquittal of 18.12.2012 made by the court of first instance of Shirak region. According to this judgment, the defendants Razmik Sargsyan, Musa Serobyan and Ara Zalyan, the defendants in accordance with paragraphs 1.6 and 14 of Part 2 of Art. 112 of RA Criminal Code, were found not guilty on the basis of Part 2 of Art. 35 of the Criminal Procedural Code acquitted for lack of evidence of their involvement in the crime.

Note that the successor of the victim Roman Yeghiazaryan also filed a lawsuit to appeal the sentence imposed by the trial court.