How much does Ashotyan's anti-corruption fight cost?

The most favorite activity of state structures of Armenia is the fight against corruption. President fights against corruption, either he calls one of his employees and urges to fight against corruption, or collects all at once and again, urges to the fight against corruption ... employees, of course, memorize the words of the President and "hang the same deceive" on the workers in their "homes".

It has been four or five years since the Minister of Education and Science Armen Ashotyan fights against corruption. Moreover, in addition, besides, that he, as Minister- excellent pupil unconditionally accepts all orders and executes them, he also develops a type of anti-corruption of his own production. So, today, Minister Armen Ashotyan presented a comprehensive program of activities to combat corruption in the field of education and science in 2013-2014. Minister Ashotyan successfully passed a comprehensive program with the same content for the 2011-2012, in line was another program, the start of which was given today.

Question: Can anyone, even the one, who has most brilliant knowledge, get a job, for example at Chekhov school (the same can be said of many other schools, by the way, in some villages to pay bribes and "good" for the top of the school are not inferior to the capital indicators)? This issue has been relevant for several years, including the "disinfected" period for comprehensive anti-corruption program.

Ashotyan is in his element-to spread issues, answer any question, not to allow to point to the problems and talk about them in person, in fact, also charges that they do not allow to solve these problems.

"4 years ago, the school director was free and hired someone, whom he liked, the the teachers wrote, saying the vacant position should be taken by competition, competitive system developed, invested, started work, new problems arose. Liberal things were written that schools should be free of academic and administrative staff in the choice, the director must be free in his choice ... it does not work, does not always work. If we now make severe, tell, say the state in the post-election period increases administrative instruments. Now we have developed the system, preventing the directors of former law. There will be a new competitive system, which deprives directors of a number of competitive power. 

There is no doubt that the same question may be asked every year, at the start or finish of each ntegrated program, and every time one can hear the same "bright" ideas.

Lusine Kesoyan